‘Taonga’ as defined by Hongi Hika

The Maori dictionary current in 1840 was the 1820 Grammar and Vocabulary of the Language of New Zealand by Cambridge University professor Samuel Lee.

Lee’s linguistic consultant was no honky with an axe to grind.

It was none other than the great Ngapuhi chief Hongi Hika.

(He loved axes too — tomahawks, to be precise — but was in England looking to upgrade to muskets.)

And Hongi defined taonga as property procured by the spear, etc.

It was purely physical

Hongi Hika’s down-to-earth definition of the 1820s could hardly be more removed from the ‘sacred relic’ status conferred by the Treaty negotiators of the 2010s.

To that corrupt one-eyed kangaroo court the Waitangi Tribunal, taonga now means anything our tribal clients can get their hands on.

Physical or metaphysical, doesn’t matter. If it can turn a dollar, it’s a taonga.

But to Hongi Hika, and Hone Heke and the other 511 chiefs who signed Te Tiriti o Waitangi, their taonga was their stuff. (more…)

Published in: on April 30, 2012 at 5:29 pm  Comments (34)  

The Treaty, beautifully explained by a wise and honest Maori leader

Sir Apirana Ngata, MA, LLB, D. Lit — the man on our $50 note. (Put there by Reserve Bank Governor, one Donald T. Brash.) If only today’s Maori leaders shared Ngata’s high regard for truth. 
 

THE TREATY OF WAITANGI

AN EXPLANATION

by The Hon. Sir Apirana Ngata
M.A., LL.B., Lit.D.

Published for the Maori Purposes Fund Board

 First published in 1922

Translated into English by M. R. Jones

Spaced out a bit for easy reading by J. L. Ansell

The words that follow are those of history’s greatest Maori statesman…  (more…)

Published in: on April 29, 2012 at 12:07 pm  Comments (92)  

Don’t be cowed by the ‘racist’ trick

I get this cowardly trick played on me a lot. It’s important we treat it with the contempt it deserves. 

Sorry if my last post came through incomplete. I pressed the Publish button instead of Save. 

All fixed now.

Published in: on April 27, 2012 at 7:39 pm  Comments (54)  

My latest Close Up ambush

Incensed by the Popata brothers’ chillingly thuggish display on Monday night, I rang Close Up first thing Tuesday and offered to provide some push-back.

Next thing you know, I’m being flown to Auckland for a debate with Hone Harawira and the supposedly ‘moderate’ young Maori blogger Morgan Godfery.

Why is it that the state broadcaster always feels the need to outnumber me two-to-one with lefties — who inevitably and rather tiresomely then label me an extreme right-winger, racist or liar.

Last time it was Willie Jackson and Paul Spoonley, this time Hone and Morgan.

Morgan seemed a pleasant chap, who has done extraordinarily well to become a spokesman for the Maori moderati at the tender age of 20.

After the show, we chatted amicably for two hours, sharing a taxi, dinner and plane ride back to Wellington.

Then he wrote this.

(Note my various replies in the comments section.)

There was a time when being flayed alive by blog commenters used to upset me.

Now I just smile and think of all the intelligent readers they’re alienating by responding to facts with abuse.

Morgan will learn this lesson in due course. 

But back to Close Up.

Sadly, Hone couldn’t be with us in person, as he was hikoiing in Kaitaia.

I found his performance rather subdued compared with my experience last year with the foaming fool Jackson.

(Maybe Hone was knackered after a hard day’s hikoiing. Or maybe it was a deliberate strategy to differentiate himself from his bully boy proteges.)

My strategy was twofold:

  1. To seed the phrase Colourblind State into the national conversation.
  2. To alert the public to the upcoming Constitutional Review, and the Maori Party’s agenda to impose a Bolivian-style animist/communist/racist constitution.

The more the Lefties mock me for suggesting this wacky-sounding plan (the actual declared agenda of Marxists like Margaret Mutu and Nin Thomas), the less comfortable they’re going to feel promoting it.

I also wanted to confront Maori with their extraordinarily violent past, not for the sheer joy of causing offence (despite undoubtedly doing so), but to wake them up to the real source of their present violence.

Namely: their forefathers, not mine.

The sad truth is that Maori in 1840 were 42 warring, cannibal, communist, slave-owning dictatorships.

The British did not destroy them, as we’ve been led to believe.

In fact, they saved them from blasting and hacking themselves to extinction.

(Somewhere between 20,000 and 60,000 Maori — up to half the race — were killed in the Musket Wars of the 1820s and 30s, compared with about 2,000 in the Sovereignty Wars of the 1860s.)

Today, thanks to inter-breeding, Christianity and British law, they’ve shed most of those violent tendencies, but (understandably) not all.

All peoples, perhaps bar the Moriori, have had to confront a brutal past, very much including Europeans.

Thanks to Christianity (once they’d got through their witch-burning phase), Europeans gave up the bloodlust, and Maori followed suit when they became equal members of the British Empire.

[A commenter has pointed out that my claim that Europeans have renounced violence is not entirely plausible, given the many wars that have been waged on that continent since 1840.

But I'm talking about daily life, which, I hope even he will agree, is less violent than it used to be.]

When Hone and Morgan claim that until Maori achieve the same health, wealth and homicide rates as Pakeha they’ll need more and more Pakeha money, they’re arguing from a position of greed, not logic.

After all, as all Maori radicals seem strangely happy to highlight, Maori are still at the bottom of every social statistic.

Still at rock bottom — after being showered with billions of dollars of benefits, and up to five full and final Treaty settlements.

Clearly, more money is not the answer.

Could that be, I wonder, because too much of it is going to feather the nests of their millionaire leaders?

Whatever, it’s time we turned off the tap and asked Maori to look inward for the answers, not outwards.

It’s time they followed their Achievers, not these Grievers.

I couldn’t get all of these messages across in the debate, but I hope I showed that not all New Zealanders are prepared to be cowed by the standover tactics of wide boys and thugs.

As I said on Close Up, our fathers and grandfathers (including those in the Maori Battalion) went to war for this country.

They paid for their patriotism with their blood.

Thousands more, Maori and Pakeha, paid with their lives.

Have we become so feeble that we’re prepared to surrender this vibrant nation that our forebears clawed from raw bush, with blood, brains, sweat, tears and guts, to a violent minority of a decent minority, for fear of being called a name?

Published in: on April 27, 2012 at 3:21 pm  Comments (43)  

Time for a Colourblind State

Last night’s Close Up piece on Hone Harawira’s militant nephew shows what happens when a government pursues a policy of endless appeasement.

It’s time this chamber of Chamberlains started running New Zealand as though it were a democracy.

I propose to ensure it does this by launching a petition for a referendum on a colourblind state – a referendum that it can ill afford to ignore.

To ensure that the government listens to the will of the people, I’m fundraising for a major public education campaign to expose the 40-year brainwashing campaign that has denied New Zealanders their right to know the truth about Crown-Maori history.

I’ve spent the past year doing little else but studying this history, and believe me it is a very different history from the one we’ve been forcefed by our schools, universities, politicians and media.

Helping me prepare for this campaign have been nine authors who between them have written over 30 books on this subject.

Very soon I’ll be setting up a site where you can read the documents I have read. Prepare to be amazed – and enraged.

One of these documents is Governor Hobson’s final English draft of the Treaty, missing for 149 years and found in 1989 – but covered up by an embarrassed government and minimised by its tame historians.

Why?

Because, like the Maori ‘Tiriti’ into which it was translated, it makes no mention of Maori owning forest and fisheries, and makes it clear that the Treaty was with all the people of New Zealand, including settlers.

Tonight it’s my turn to appear on Close Up — with Hone Harawira and another Maori, Morgan Godfery.

(I’m getting used to these two-on-one ambushes, but will do my best to get a word in edgeways.)

More on the campaign when I return from Auckland.

If you’d like to donate to the very considerable costs of a high-profile advertising campaign, please do so here.

Before long, there will be a trust, Facebook page and website. But the first step is fundraising.

Published in: on April 24, 2012 at 8:00 pm  Comments (40)  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 156 other followers