My latest Close Up ambush

Incensed by the Popata brothers’ chillingly thuggish display on Monday night, I rang Close Up first thing Tuesday and offered to provide some push-back.

Next thing you know, I’m being flown to Auckland for a debate with Hone Harawira and the supposedly ‘moderate’ young Maori blogger Morgan Godfery.

Why is it that the state broadcaster always feels the need to outnumber me two-to-one with lefties — who inevitably and rather tiresomely then label me an extreme right-winger, racist or liar.

Last time it was Willie Jackson and Paul Spoonley, this time Hone and Morgan.

Morgan seemed a pleasant chap, who has done extraordinarily well to become a spokesman for the Maori moderati at the tender age of 20.

After the show, we chatted amicably for two hours, sharing a taxi, dinner and plane ride back to Wellington.

Then he wrote this.

(Note my various replies in the comments section.)

There was a time when being flayed alive by blog commenters used to upset me.

Now I just smile and think of all the intelligent readers they’re alienating by responding to facts with abuse.

Morgan will learn this lesson in due course. 

But back to Close Up.

Sadly, Hone couldn’t be with us in person, as he was hikoiing in Kaitaia.

I found his performance rather subdued compared with my experience last year with the foaming fool Jackson.

(Maybe Hone was knackered after a hard day’s hikoiing. Or maybe it was a deliberate strategy to differentiate himself from his bully boy proteges.)

My strategy was twofold:

  1. To seed the phrase Colourblind State into the national conversation.
  2. To alert the public to the upcoming Constitutional Review, and the Maori Party’s agenda to impose a Bolivian-style animist/communist/racist constitution.

The more the Lefties mock me for suggesting this wacky-sounding plan (the actual declared agenda of Marxists like Margaret Mutu and Nin Thomas), the less comfortable they’re going to feel promoting it.

I also wanted to confront Maori with their extraordinarily violent past, not for the sheer joy of causing offence (despite undoubtedly doing so), but to wake them up to the real source of their present violence.

Namely: their forefathers, not mine.

The sad truth is that Maori in 1840 were 42 warring, cannibal, communist, slave-owning dictatorships.

The British did not destroy them, as we’ve been led to believe.

In fact, they saved them from blasting and hacking themselves to extinction.

(Somewhere between 20,000 and 60,000 Maori — up to half the race — were killed in the Musket Wars of the 1820s and 30s, compared with about 2,000 in the Sovereignty Wars of the 1860s.)

Today, thanks to inter-breeding, Christianity and British law, they’ve shed most of those violent tendencies, but (understandably) not all.

All peoples, perhaps bar the Moriori, have had to confront a brutal past, very much including Europeans.

Thanks to Christianity (once they’d got through their witch-burning phase), Europeans gave up the bloodlust, and Maori followed suit when they became equal members of the British Empire.

[A commenter has pointed out that my claim that Europeans have renounced violence is not entirely plausible, given the many wars that have been waged on that continent since 1840.

But I'm talking about daily life, which, I hope even he will agree, is less violent than it used to be.]

When Hone and Morgan claim that until Maori achieve the same health, wealth and homicide rates as Pakeha they’ll need more and more Pakeha money, they’re arguing from a position of greed, not logic.

After all, as all Maori radicals seem strangely happy to highlight, Maori are still at the bottom of every social statistic.

Still at rock bottom — after being showered with billions of dollars of benefits, and up to five full and final Treaty settlements.

Clearly, more money is not the answer.

Could that be, I wonder, because too much of it is going to feather the nests of their millionaire leaders?

Whatever, it’s time we turned off the tap and asked Maori to look inward for the answers, not outwards.

It’s time they followed their Achievers, not these Grievers.

I couldn’t get all of these messages across in the debate, but I hope I showed that not all New Zealanders are prepared to be cowed by the standover tactics of wide boys and thugs.

As I said on Close Up, our fathers and grandfathers (including those in the Maori Battalion) went to war for this country.

They paid for their patriotism with their blood.

Thousands more, Maori and Pakeha, paid with their lives.

Have we become so feeble that we’re prepared to surrender this vibrant nation that our forebears clawed from raw bush, with blood, brains, sweat, tears and guts, to a violent minority of a decent minority, for fear of being called a name?

Published in: on April 27, 2012 at 3:21 pm  Comments (43)  

On Close-Up with Willie Jackson

Just had a call from Mark Sainsbury wanting me on his show tonight to talk about the racist abuse on TradeMe over the listing of the personalised plate MAORI for $99,000.

Small-time internet trader Bruce Haliday listed the licence plate “Maori” four days ago for $99,000 and, by last night, the auction had almost 16,000 views and screeds of comments, many of them blatantly racist.

The mildest included: “Any maori that can afford this plate stole the monie” and “Maybe donate half the money to a charity to help prevent maoris throwing their babies into walls?”

Also on will be Willie Jackson and Professor Paul Spoonley.

Paul’s a sociologist from Massey Albany, whose research interests include ethnic policies and political extremism (especially neo-fascism).

So you can see how this is going to go: a two (if not three)-on-one setup to implicate me in the spread of racist abuse.

Suffice it to say, I’m not going to let them get away with that. This is my first time live on a major TV show, but I plan to give as good as I get.

In case Willie doesn’t let me get a word in edgeways, I deplore racial abuse — all the moreso when it’s dispensed anonymously, as tends to be the way on the net.

I once had the experience of seeing my Taiwanese brother-in-law being told to ‘go home’ by a passing carload of youths on his first day in Auckland. I felt ashamed to be a New Zealander.

But I’m not ashamed to tell the truth. Even an uncomfortable truth.

There’s a world of difference between racist abuse and truthful discussion of racial policies. (Or racist policies, as we have in New Zealand and need to abolish.)

No doubt the others will quote liberally from things I’ve written on this blog and in the ACT ad.

And some of those things — especially accounts of Maori cannibalism — are far from pretty.

Like the ghastly account of Te Rauparaha ripping apart a pregnant mother and roasting her embryo on a stick.

That’s sick, but it happened. It was straight from a ship’s diary.

And it’s relevant to ask why Chris Finlayson would want to compensate Ngati Toa $10 million for the loss of what he calls their ‘maritime empire’ that enabled Te Rauparaha to travel to Kaiapoi to slaughter, enslave and devour the local tribe.

(And why the Porirua City Council would want to name its indoor sports arena after such a thug.)

We need to know those things if we’re going to gain an honest understanding of our country’s past.

Otherwise we’re stuck with the dishonest, sanitised, state-sponsored myths we’ve been fed by politically-correct politicians, in league with the grieving, grasping iwi aristocracy.

New Zealand has become the Land of the Long White Lie. It’s time for a revolution of truth-telling about the 4 Big Cons that are being perpetrated upon us: the John Key Con, the Maorification Con, the Global Warming Con and the Teacher Unions Con.

I hope I’m able to make a start tonight. See you at 7pm on One.

 

Published in: on August 5, 2011 at 6:00 pm  Comments (22)  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 156 other followers